Physical risk, at the address.
Flood ratings, depths and annual-loss estimates; erosion; subsidence and ground indicators - the view supervisory expectations are converging on.
At the address, not the postcode.
Physical hazard modelling joined at the property point, not smeared across a postcode. Two homes on the same street can carry different flood exposure; the postcode average hides exactly the case you need to see.
Depth bands, not just a flag.
Flood ratings come with modelled depths and annual-loss figures - the scenario-relevant detail supervisory and disclosure work is converging on. A yes or no flag does not survive a stress question; a depth band does.
Ground and legacy indicators.
Subsidence markers over multiple horizons, coal-mining reporting areas, historic landfill and radon class - the physical-risk view that used to require three separate searches, joined to the same UPRN.
Aggregates for the whole book.
The same fields aggregate into portfolio concentration views, so the physical-risk picture your second line reports is one you can evidence property by property.
The surface-water percentage is an annual probability; the risk category is a separate field - we never conflate the two. Environment is a Great Britain product today. Dictionary: July 2026
Data, not advice.
Bring the book. See the exposure.
Address-level physical risk across your portfolio, aggregated into the concentration views disclosure work now expects.